Showing posts with label ICOT 2013. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ICOT 2013. Show all posts

Saturday, 6 April 2013

Ewan McIntosh- The Problem Finders ICOT 2013

At the beginning Ewan challenged our thinking around;
Who is successful?
How do we measure success?
Which raises the question do we have to get hung up measuring success (meeting the standard) and is it taking away from the creativity? Are we breathing down the necks of our students to make sure they fit our mould of what we would consider achieved forgetting to give our kids the chance to play and find the answer out for themselves through exploration? I think we need to stop sometimes and slow things down. Through inquiry the big idea means so much more to kids than being spoon feed. MAYBE WE NEED TO LET THE KIDS DISCOVER IT! THEN JUSTIFY IT.
The essence of creativity is that people who are successful know what makes their ideas great!
They know 'The Why' why they are doing what they are doing.
They provoke
and They have a process.
The motivation is then there because they know why they want to learn it.
Often we consider the children achieving at or above where they should be as successful. But those that find reading or writing or maths difficult can be successful performers. Perhaps once I have found each child's success I need to use this to help to help make the other areas successful. Eg: Having had a child who picks up songs lyrics at the drop of the hat it has worked well for me in the past to teach that child to their times tables through song. How could I help the ones that are great at technology to read better? Or the mathematicians to add more detail to their writing? Could I liken it to in maths we need to stretch the problem out to show our working. Writing is the same where we stretch out the description so that the reader sees the same image as we do?

He picked up on Guy Claxton's six pillars.
Challenge
Collaboration
Responsiblity
Respect
Motivation (real things)
Choice

Children want challenge-they don't buy a video game that they are going to clock in two hours. But sometimes this can be a balancing act for those with low resilience  I find sometimes they do need a task they know they can succeed in balanced with a task that is going to push their understanding further.
Collaborate-Ewan said you won't find any lone genius in creativity who is successful because everyone works in a team. But he touched on an interesting point. Sometimes working as a team means all working together but sometimes it can also mean working interdependently passing it onto someone else in your team once your portion is finished.
Responsiblity-Kids want to be responsible for their learning.
Respect-Let them go down tangents don't shut down their ideas too early on, let them inquire and explore because it is often the ideas that are off track that the kids will learn the most from.
Real things-motivation if it is not experiential how do we learn from it? It has to be relevant.
Choice-When do I give my kids choice? How could I give them more? In maths I do have like a daily 5 board where they have to do maths with a buddy, maths by themselves, maths writing etc and they can choose which ones they do when so long as they do a range of tasks over the week.
Could I give them more choice in reading for example by getting them to come up with their own follow up? How would you like to show what you learnt from that book? This would then open up the opportunity for them to showcase their creativity.

When the world Zigs, Zag. Ewan showed us the Levi advertisement for the introduction of black jeans so out of the realm it doesn't even show a picture of jeans but got people talking and was extremely creative. The words 'When the world zigs, zag,' has become the companies slogan now, which means the story of how the company became a success is told. Ewan said imagine a kids project defining your schools image or logo like the Levi campaign  How could I get the kids to showcase their learning? Is there an app that the kids could use as like an advertisement for the children's learning? What would they advertise? Would it look like an overall showcase of the terms learning? Would it be a showcase of the process of learning something tricky? Would it be an advertisement of...

He talked about not letting technology become a means of substitution rather than transformation. Eg: Using the i-pad to take notes instead of using pen and paper is no different. But to set those notes up as a google docs means that people are bouncing ideas off one another and getting more from the notes that are taking transforming the notes. This is something I need to be wery of with the more technology I have in my classroom. Asking myself what is the purpose of this app? What is it actually teaching the kids? How is it benefiting them?

He talked about Googleable vs Non-googable. Moving the title of the topic away from an essential question to more of a statement to hook them in and get them to have an opinion and justify it. Eg: When does music become noise? When does noise become music? Became 'Music is just noise.' Make the subject line tantalising for the kids, for them to take it where they want it to go. Use the googleable questions to go and find it out but then spend the rich learning time to find the non-googleable answers. The people that will succeed in the world the way it is heading is that they are not just problem solvers they are problem finders who can see the gap that no one else can.  He spoke about using master classes more where a kid asks to learn something and you find out who else wants to learn that so that learning becomes just in time rather than so much of the learning being just in case. This googleable/non-googable questions has been difficult to implement at the beginning of the year. It has also highlighted the valued googleable questions have in helping us further our understanding as the kids in their interdependence inquiry into why there are more birds in our backyards was very broad and they had to answer the googleable questions to be able to have a better understanding of the non-googleable.

He introduced the idea of a wonderbox where kids can explore a new topic and take an object out of the box and after a week of research they are able to share what they know about that object.
The wonderbox is something I have used to help introduce the idea of Interdependence. It was a great way to get the kids thinking about what we were going to be studying this term without giving them the answer. I pulled out an object one at a time and they had to link the ideas together to think about what it was we were studying. Interdependence is a big word and I cut it up into In ter depen dence. I pulled these chunks out in the wrong order and the kids looked at it. They went well there is the word dependence and inter it could be interdependence. So although they had no idea what interdependence actually meant they were able to piece it together to make the word using their prior knowledge of other words.





I loved his idea of creating TED talks giving the kids a place to share their ideas and speak to an audience in a comfortable setting. They were able to 'perform their learning.' Because kids live to perform. He Tweeted his students TED talks to provide the wide audience and the kids even set up a TED sign. They were challenged with their idea for a topic. Ideas went from 'My mum is the best,' to 'Why do we never tell those the closest to us that we love them enough.' Another idea was 'Do animals have a secret language?' The first idea of my mum is the best well most people are going to say that about their own parents at 7 years old and where is the so what, who cares element to that title (again I guess it is that concept of selling/advertising your learning with a catchy phrase or title to make others want to find out more about what you learnt). I loved this idea and would like to try it out around speeches time. Raising the question 'how can we inspire those always remember moments in our kids?'

He talked about how we often use ping pong questioning. Instead use Pose, Pause, Pounce, Bounce technique. Pose a question then pause ten seconds then let someone pounce. What do you think of this answer? Then bounce it onto another child what do you think about these two responses? Put ideas down on post it notes challenge kids to come up with 100 ideas in 10 minutes. Record a lot of the inquiry, exploration, investigation side of the project in photos on i-pads.

Another great idea around emotions was to use photographs to get kids to start talking about how they feel about their learning. Emotive photographs that have nothing to do with learning but represent hiding or being pulled in all directions or a long road ahead or joy. Often kids can see then that others are feeling scared or nervous or challenge showing they are not alone and suddenly giving them the pick me up they needed to carry on.

A very inspiring speaker with lots of new ideas to try and food for thought.


Friday, 8 February 2013

Personality types

I have done a lot of personality tests myself over the years at high school and since high school. But attending the International Conference On Thinking 2013 in Wellington at the beginning of the year reminded me of these tests and got me thinking of how these could be used in the classroom.
I knew that going into 2013 I had two particular boys that did not get on, in fact they have used very strong words, expressing how they feel about each other.
This got me thinking...
Is it that they are purposely going out of their way to annoy each other or is there a way to show them that sometimes that don't mean to annoy, it is just who they are? That message of all being different but because of this we are special and unique.
David Koutsoukis was a fantastic presenter at the conference and spoke about these different personality types.
Firstly he spoke about having 'Kefi'- a zest for life and that this will radiate out infecting those around you with a positive outlook. He had great messages about using the soft calm voice (which we all know gets the best results but sometimes I know I can be pushed past the soft calm voice) and the power of the pause. Don't just default as the teacher (or a parent) to outright 'No' as the reply to questions take the time to pause and make a more  thought out response to children's requests.
Sitting at a table with some other ladies I really liked the saying one of them shared. "Catch children in the art of being good." It is something I am always trying to do, acknowledging the positive behaviour but I thought is was a nice quote to remind you of that when kids haven't had such a great day.

But the majority of David's talk was about how we all walk to a different tune and see the world through different coloured glasses. He gave us four cards; a blue one with a triangle for the analysers, a red heart for the carer's, a yellow circle for the players (the spontaneous ones) a a green square for the safekeepers.
He asked us to read the cards which gave examples of what these personalities are comfortable with and what they don't like as well the habits that are often noticed by others but sub conscious to the person. We had to stack the cards in order with the least like us at the bottom through to the most like us being on the top. We then moved to a corner of the room to see who else was like us. He spoke about how one personality would frustrate another eg: the players who are impulsive might frustrate the safekeepers who are organised and need to have a plan and dislike surprises or risks.
SIDE NOTE-David mentioned that most teachers fall into the Safekeeper or Carer personality.

So in the second week back at school I decided I would like to get my class to value the differences in people through this personality game.
We first of all talked about how we are lucky because there is only one of us. No one is exactly like us we are unique and this is also what makes us special.
I spoke about the cards and I explained what traits you might find in each personality type and then gave the kids a chance to have a look at the cards for themselves and decide which one resonated with them. I was surprised to be honest at how well they managed this. I then asked them to get into certain corners of the room to show who were our carer's, safekeepers, analysers and players.
SIDE NOTE-Interestingly I had a lot of carer's and players in my class this year.
I then modelled what David did sparking discussion around how some personality types could potentially frustrate or annoy others.
We had a great discussion around it and then I posed the question to the class. What do you think was the purpose of doing this exercise? Why do you think I wanted us to find out more about our personalities?
The responses were very mature I thought coming from 7&8-year-olds and a I was very impressed.
It was also interesting at the end one of the girls in the class put her hand up and asked. "What personality are you Mrs Head?" I told the class that I had done this in Wellington and that I was a yellow but that I was a stronger (player-yellow) when I was younger and have become more of the green Safekeeper as I have got older. A few then sparked up and said yeah I think I was ....and now I am more ....
Below is a photo of what I recorded from these discussions.




NEXT STEPS:
Come Monday I would like to have a post on our class blog about our personalities including the photo above. But I would also like to get some video footage of kids talking about their own personality. Why did they place themselves in that personality type? How has it changed their thinking about people in their class that they may not have got on with in the past? What will they do differently next time someone in the class annoys them? Do you think it is a good or bad thing that we all have different personalities and why? Do you think your personality has changed at all and if so why do you think it might have changed?

I will also set up a classroom display with a copy of the cards, who falls into which type with a brief description of that personality and our thoughts around the purpose of the activity. Hopefully when kids become frustrated they may with practice look to our personality wall and see that they are not like me they think differently and may not have realised they upset me. This can become something the kids refer to throughout the year and it maybe that in time they set goals from it to become more of another type. eg: If they are too much of a player and need to have some order/organisation in their lives.